Comments on 'HHO gas part one (alternative to fossil fuels)'

Back

Next

fooschnikens (August 27th, 2008 @ 11:57 am)
ATTENTION: Apparently chevron oil (corrupt American oil company) bought the rights to NiMH battery technology so they could prevent auto manufacturers from using it to build more efficient hybrid vehicles and force us to keep buying gasoline. Wanna read an article about just how corrupt big oil companies are? Google this and read the article: Did Citco Oil really buy an electric Car battery only to destroy it?
Chunes3 (August 26th, 2008 @ 3:59 pm)
I can't believe so many people can be so stupid as to believe that electrolysis results in a net energy gain. Actually, taking a look at contemporary education systems, I can't be surprised.
Underbyte0000 (August 25th, 2008 @ 1:51 pm)
Think about it dude. If that denny klein guy made a machine where electrolyzing water would result in a net energy gain, then why would he have to plug it into the wall? Wouldent the net energy output be enough to drive the next cycle of reactions?
Underbyte0000 (August 25th, 2008 @ 1:49 pm)
Perhaps, but the current implementation of this method is nothing more then snake oil. Besides the fact that the people who tell you that it increases MPG in your car *WONT* tell you how it works, the fact remains that electrolysis is pretty inefficient and results in a net energy loss, and so its a pipe dream to try and get free energy out of water. In fact, the only use i know of molecular physics for net energy gain were some weapons that were the most horrible ever unleashed by mankind.
aphor (August 25th, 2008 @ 11:09 am)
Not necessarily true. The real problem is that the idea you *want* to refute requires research which is "computationally intensive." That means it is very hard to prove there is no way to exploit loopholes in the second law of thermodynamics at nanoscale that *might* make this big idea possible or practical.
Underbyte0000 (August 24th, 2008 @ 3:10 am)
Oxyhydrogen does have some useful applications for welding, but people who say that it will power their cars are fools. Its physics, guys. It literally takes more energy to break the bond between the elements in water then the the energy you get back by Hydrogen and oxygen combustion. You cant beat mother nature on this. When you electrolyze, your losing more energy then you gain. Its just that simple.
directorstu (August 22nd, 2008 @ 3:16 pm)
its also better looking and can pick up girls
directorstu (August 22nd, 2008 @ 3:14 pm)
sounds like fun! I think critics are saying it takes more fuel to generate the electricity needed than you save when you add the gas. I was wondering about that though... ...the engine is running anyway, charging the battery so maybe youre right.
dontKSmebro (August 21st, 2008 @ 3:03 pm)
Usually, I find negativity in all videos on YouTube. Not today. Now that our technology is evolving -- and to our planet's advantage -- perhaps we are destined for something greater. War, famine, greed are destroying us... we need to get our act together before something truly catastrophic happens
HYDROCHARGED1 (August 20th, 2008 @ 9:22 am)
I like it. It works for my customers and they save money on gas. We all win! HYDROCHARGED(dot)com
bcoulal (August 19th, 2008 @ 10:05 am)
Take a riding lawn mower or motorcycle lawn mower battery, get some tap water, wire copper wires, one to the anode and the other to the cathode, stick it in a container full of water, collect the bubbles in an empty 2-liter bottle for about 5 minutes, get a lighter and light the bottom of it and tell me it's a scam.
bcoulal (August 19th, 2008 @ 10:03 am)
What if you're using Solar Power, Wind power, Ocean Wave power, Hydro-electric power, or Human power? Would that still be wasting electricity even though the sea of energy is abundant in the Universe inside the Vacuum?

Next

 

RV Camping and Outdoors Videos Copyright © 2008 All Rights Reserved.