RV Camping and Outdoors Videos

water4fuelh20 (September 28th, 2008 @ 3:18 pm)

:) :)

vison2create (August 25th, 2008 @ 3:38 pm)

Yes, there is no more HHO produced under vacuum. The visual bubbles are simply larger per the ideal gas law: PV=nRT. The number of moles of hydrogen and oxygen produced is exactly the same as long at the current is constant. Production is a function of current only, since electrolysis requires free electrons.

Stratous0 (July 11th, 2008 @ 11:27 pm)

Umm, you really need to watch at 56 seconds, then fwd it to 2.44 and tell me there is no difference. the bubbles are going twice as fast.

patrickuhri (June 10th, 2008 @ 5:41 am)

You are only putting the bubbler in a vacuum. Try putting a vacuum on the hho cell

cribcat1 (May 21st, 2008 @ 7:52 am)

it's the same thing that ZFF came up with. Thanks for the work.

iscuba11 (December 22nd, 2007 @ 4:35 am)

As one has stated, the cell itself has to be under vacuum. Another youtube video shows this is the correct method. In the other video, the author dropped the vacuum to 25" of mercury on the cell itself. Best Regards, Dave Have a Merry Christmas Everybody!

nasanction (August 1st, 2007 @ 3:14 pm)

Your cell was under vacuum. Maybe not as much as a car would deliver, but none the less the physics are the same. The vacuum will pull bubbles from the water, but not the cell it's self. If it could pull HHO off the cell it's self, then there would be no need for the electrolysis would there... Great work! I would like to collaborate with you on your findings. You can see my results so far on my posted video's.

aparodox2003 (July 18th, 2007 @ 5:28 am)

sorry to disagree but you might have better luck if you pressurize the cell itself-you should find that more energy is required for an equivelant reaction at normal pressure-wich leads me to beleive if you reduce the pressure in the cell less energy will be required for the reaction. i haven't plotted a graph for it so im not 100% sure on this but from what i've seen im convinced.

h2opower (July 18th, 2007 @ 12:51 am)

Yes we are proving well known science is not complete. Meyer's did it in a big way. Now the way I tested the unit with a vacuum is at 30 mm hg at the max vacuum on a car. Gas production has to go up, it's is just chemistry. Trust me.

Fordenergy (July 10th, 2007 @ 10:53 pm)

One last though after wating the video again. When I release the vacuum under 12V where is the water going? (the cell) because of the vacuum in the cell if there was no vacuum on that cell it wouldnt effect my feed tube.

Fordenergy (July 10th, 2007 @ 10:46 pm)

But I may be wrong I'll wait to see the video in action to prove the math. After all we are proving science wrong aren't we?

Fordenergy (July 10th, 2007 @ 10:45 pm)

If what you are saying is correct then there is no vacuum at all applied on the cell; which I know is not the case due to the air being pulled from the cell. Before this video my cell had a leak and it looked like my production was way up until I realized a seal on the (CELL) was leaking and feeding the bubbler. This test is after the cell leak was fixed and there was no difference in production under vacuum.